DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1601 _
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 -
BC
Docket No: 00295-14
(13 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to. the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
-regulations, and policies.
After careful and. cons¢ientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was. insufficient
to establish the existence: of probable material. error. or.
injustice.
- You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty.on 14 February 2005. On 18 October 2005, you received
nonjudicial punishment. {NJP) for operating a vehicle while under
the influence of alcohol and failure to obey a lawful order . by
drinking alcohol while underage. ‘On 8 July 2009, you signed and
acknowledged that you: were being assigned a-waivable RE-3C
(reenlistment. authorized by the Commandant of the Marine Corps}.
reentry code upon your separation. You were separated on 13.
July .2009, with an honorable characterization of service and
assigned an RE- 3c reentry code.. m2 8
The Board, in-its: review of. your. entire record and application,
” garefully weighed all potentially mitigating. factors present in |
'. your case. . However, the Board found those. factors were —
insufficient to warrant any. change | in yes reentry code, given.
your record of misconduct. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished ‘upon request.
It is: regretted that the circumstances of your case are such.
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and —
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
|. the Board. -In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
oa presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
«Consequently, when applying for a. correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the |
.existence of probable material error or injustice.
sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR632 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0330 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. You were released from active duty and , transferred to the reserve component on 28 September 2013, with an honorable characterization of service and assigned an RE-3C (when directed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps or when eligible and disqualifying factor is not covered by any other code) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0440 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4929 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty, and is not recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0446 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0714 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. However, the Board found those factors were insufficient to warrant any change in your reentry code, given your record of NUP's for serious misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0445 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0649 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were separated on 15 July 2011, with an honorable discharge due to non-retention on active duty and assigned an RE-3C (when directed by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0679 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1122 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2015. in this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances. The RE-3C reentry code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires.